Had I bee reading Helsingin Sanomat this week I would not have been able to say in my post earlier today that there was nothing to be alarmed about. A few bits of recent HS stuff to note:
about 500 Helsinki residents were asked questions about, er, it’s not quite clear, but the answers were that almost a half (apparently) want a Guggenheim Museum here. Even more popular, apparently, than this global bränd entertainment, would be a new Helsinki Central Library building. Some replies stated that these new buildings should go on the land around Töölö Bay. Thanks to Arkkivahti for bringing this example of the worst of our only national daily to our attention (though my ignorance was bliss!) The headline then, yesterday 22.2.2011 was
Ensin on saatava keskustakirjasto, vasta sitten Guggenheimin vuoro
Why exactly the story was in the culture pages is not clear.
Then there’s the news about the City’s terrible financial woes, to which the only solution is to sell the family silver. This includes some great architecture and lovely urban background (so comfortable you may not even notice it’s there) like the old Tennis Palatsi (which we mentioned on this blog a few weeks ago) and Lasipalatsi, so special (and so unlikely to have survived!) that if you don’t notice it then you don’t deserve to live anywhere near it.
On 21. February the paper reports that CNN reports (bear with us) that mayor Jussi Pajunen is boasting about MASSIVE rebuilding in Helsinki in the next 25 years.
For the time being however, the traces of brilliant workmaship and exquisite architecture, oodles of good luck (or contingent accident) and a few visionary deicisions, can still be enjoyed in this fair city of ours. Proof of Helsinki’s attractions is reported by HS in English – of course.